WHOSE FINGERPRINTS ARE THEY?
Support A1+!On July 4, Levon Gulyan’s advocate Hrayr Ghukasyan presented the conclusions of local and international experts. There are differences in the description of injuries, the advocate said.
To remind, according to official sources, Levon Gulyan was invited to an interrogation. His attempts to flee were doomed to failure as he fell down from the second floor.
The local experts hardly touched upon the question. They ignored the injuries in the right part of the body, and the bruises on Gulyan’s shoulders and jaw. The experts didn’t answer a most important question, whether there were bodily injuries on the body inflicted before the fall. According to international experts some bodily injuries might have been caused before the fall, noted Hrayr Ghukasyan.
Another serious argument is that Gulyan’s body didn’t s hit the pipe sideways, as it was presented in the preliminary conclusion, but on the back. According to Hrayr Ghukasyan this fact can be deemed as starting point. “The international experts expressed readiness to review the case,” Ghukasyan noted.
The advocate is concerned over a few issues. Gulyan’s relatives don’t have international experts’ official conclusion. They got acquainted with the electronic version.
A number of issues still remain mysterious. During the dactyloscopic examination the fingerprints found on the window of Investigator Tadevosyan’s office, proved to belong neither to Tadevosyan, nor to his deputy Mgoyan. This gives ground for serious contemplations.
