Why is the NCTR avoiding the court?
The National Commission on Television and Radio and ArmNews TV avoid going to court.
"A1+" was compelled to defend its violated rights at the Administrative Court of Appeals alone since the defendant hadn't shown up. The defendant had petitioned the court to hold the trial in his absence.
"A1+" demands that the court consider the 16 December 2010 decision 96A of the National Commission on Television and Radio invalid. According to the decision, "A1+" lost in the N 11 digital broadcasting tender, and the Commission declared ArmNews the winner.
"President of the NCTR Grigor Amalyan has the same equal rights as do the other members of the NCTR. He couldn't make a decision or take a survey from other state officials on his own, meaning those acts were not right," "A1+"'s attorney Alexander Sahakyan said, taking into account the fact that Grigor Amalyan had used, for example, diplomatic levers when studying "A1+"'s financial proposal.
"A1+"'s attorney Alexander Sahakyan doesn't trust the NCTR's activities and says: "His appeal didn't touch upon the arguments and explanations that we presented."
After "A1+"'s protest and the release of the NCTR's explanations, Judge Artur Arakelyan announced that the court would announce the verdict on February 9 at 17:00.
"A1+" had filed the appeal to the Court of Appeals on November 5, 2011.
